{"id":1928,"date":"2020-03-25T19:31:45","date_gmt":"2020-03-25T19:31:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/what-s-happening-in-search-and-what-s-happening-next\/"},"modified":"2022-08-10T14:50:11","modified_gmt":"2022-08-10T14:50:11","slug":"what-s-happening-in-search-and-what-s-happening-next","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/logic-magic\/what-s-happening-in-search-and-what-s-happening-next\/","title":{"rendered":"What’s Happening in Search (and What’s Happening Next)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\nThere\u2019s been a lot of buzz recently about a little thing called Bing! While not having the immediate lift that Microsoft was hoping for and that some pundits predicted, it has caused shockwaves in the search community. Advertised as the \u201cDecision Engine\u201d and backed by a $500 million ad campaign, it does not seem to live up to its billing yet, but does bring some hope as the third most popular search platform.
\n
\nMicrosoft CEO Steve Ballmer is certainly behind the promise of Bing, as he says the company is willing to put 10 percent of its operating income behind the new search engine. Add that to the likelihood that Microsoft will own Yahoo! by the end of the summer, and you have what many in the search community have been longing for: someone to seriously compete with Google.
\n
\nYahoo! has also made some changes and recently launched its newest version of Yahoo.com. The new site is more of a social media aggregator that supports contextual ads. The concept is much cleaner than previous versions and allows users to set up RSS feeds and even view their Facebook activity from within Yahoo!. The site can also suggest widgets based on the user\u2019s search behavior, taking Yahoo! to a whole new level.
\n
\nAnother new search engine offers its own unique spin on search. Wolfram|Alpha crunches data to provide answers that may not even exist online until a user searches for them. Wolfram|Alpha is an entirely new concept that is meant to compliment what existing search engines already do. Rather than searching for matching keywords and terms, Wolfram|Alpha pulls data sets approved by the site\u2019s staff.
\n
\nWolfram|Alpha provides its users with mathematical answers to their searches, answers that a more traditional search engine would require these users to calculate on their own. For example, say a user attempts to find the calorie count of a chocolate cake recipe. While a traditional engine can provide a listing of the nutritional information for each item included in the recipe, Wolfram|Alpha will take this data and add it up to provide the user with the cake\u2019s total calories.
\n
\nSeveral other search engines have sprung up recently, driven by a need for more categorized results. These search engines hope to provide faster and smarter user searches that are also more targeted, personal, and visually appealing.
\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n
\nWhile not a new concept, Universal Search will take on a more prominent role in 2010, and all three of the major engines are in a rush to bring it 100 percent to market this year. Simply put, Universal Search is the process of returning listings for images, videos, reviews, blogs, news, and local listings all on the same search engine results page (SERP). The implications are huge for marketers, as this means the potential for share of voice is increased dramatically. Imagine a world where a search for one term lands your brand in five spots on the same page. The shift for SEO is tremendous, as the top listing becomes only part of the equation.
\n
\nAs categorization becomes the new buzzword, it will bring a new complexity to search engine optimization, but one thing will remain constant\u2014relevancy. Universal Search and the concept of categorization will force content marketers to align by segments with unique messages and coordinated topics so that content does not become fragmented.
\n
\nSearch results across the major search engines will also have a more real-time flavor with news and blog postings listed as they happen.
<\/p>\n
\n
\nThe newest search engine that seems to have the potential for the biggest seismic impact on the way users search comes from the social media realm. Twitter is working to capitalize on the rapid pace of online news by providing its users with the ability to perform real-time searches for online discussions, a feature that Google has as of yet failed to provide.
\n
\nIn the eyes of some, Twitter has the potential to be as important to real-time search as YouTube is to video. Twitter is able to provide lightning- quick access to breaking news with links to reports, blogs, and images from the event as it unfolds.
\n
\nWith the recent death of pop star Michael Jackson, most folks in our office bypassed traditional search and went straight to Twitter for real- time news and conversations. It is important to note that Twitter servers did crumble under the pressure, a whale that reared its ugly head many times that night. But even with this minor setback, Twitter proved that its real-time search capabilities place it above the rest. While Google does include news sites in its searches, it lacks Twitter\u2019s speed for providing timely news coverage. When it comes to current events, Twitter has greater scope and also provides instant updates\u2014something Google cannot do.
\n
\nTwitter Search, as a result, has become a more popular means of tracking breaking news among an increasing number of users. But, it doesn\u2019t stop there. Twitter Search has also become a popular tool for finding information about market trends as well as connecting with people with shared interests who can provide insight into the user\u2019s specific search questions. It enables users to access real-time conversations about local topics\u2014 everything from the best restaurants to the best car dealerships.
\n
\nSo how does it do it? Twitter\u2019s search engine looks for keywords in recent user tweets that match the search request and ranks them with the most recent keywords first. This means the top post might only be a few seconds old. Google\u2019s index, while very extensive, tends to appear static when compared to Twitter. Twitter provides information in seconds rather than the hours or even days it might take Google to index new content.
\n
\nTwitter\u2019s incorporation of search functionality into its site makes it easier to gather trending information for popular keywords, enabling a deeper analysis of real-time conversations as well as a quicker way of finding relevant topics. Twitter is more than a way to interact with others; it\u2019s also a huge pool of information that is based on the lives of its users.
\n
\nWhile there is considerable hoopla surrounding Twitter, it will be several years before the site develops both the technology and accurate search results that will enable it to chip into Google\u2019s massive market share. However, there are several reasons why Twitter still has a good chance of becoming the future face of search.
\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
\nDespite its strengths, there are some potential stumbling blocks in Twitter\u2019s path toward becoming a respectable and reliable search engine. Search relevancy remains a sticky point; currently, search findings are sorted by date rather than by relevancy, which makes it difficult for users to determine the value of the returned information.
\n
\nThe swine flu coverage provided by Twitter users placed a spotlight on the social network\u2019s shortcomings in this area. Rather than moving to established and recognized authorities, Twitter users instead reacted to unsubstantiated claims via user tweets. Unlike search engine requests looking for more information, Twitter conversations about swine flu have been accused of being motivated by user desires to fit in, do what their friends are doing, or simply gain more popularity and followers. As a result, Twitter users misinformed other users and started a panic by broadcasting their fears rather than facts. For Twitter searches to be truly relevant, all participants must be genuine. The potential for Twitter to become a home for spammers and marketers who are merely pushing links and deals could potentially damage Twitter Search\u2019s results.
\n
\nFor its value as a search tool to grow, Twitter must first augment its search capabilities and build a reliable algorithm for its searches. Steps are being taken to enhance the system and provide the remedy to these ailments. The path to search respectability will also depend on whether its own users turn to Twitter for their searches. At present, most Twitter users do not rely on Twitter Search for a majority of their inquiries.
\n
\nTo address these concerns, Twitter is planning to include links referenced in tweets as part of its search function. There is a sizeable number of these links already, so if Twitter continues to grow as projected, these links could eventually represent a large portion of the web\u2019s overall content. This would make Twitter Search a far more effective and complete search engine capable of competing with Google.
\n
\nThere are also plans to add a reputation ranking system that will rank tweets by the tweeters\u2019 credibility ratings. Potential criteria for these rankings would include the number of followers and retweets the individual has, thereby enabling users to make more sense of their Twitter search results.
\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\nWhile the potential for Twitter to offer valuable, real-time search results exists, some areas of concern outside of the site\u2019s search capabilities cast shadows on the ultimate fate of Twitter Search. As of yet, Twitter has not caught on with younger users. According to a study performed by the Participatory Marketing Network, almost all 18- to 24-year-old consumers report participating in at least one social networking site, but only 22 percent of them mention using Twitter. In addition, comScore found that the majority of these users access the service primarily to follow friends or celebrities. Family members and company tweets do not generate as much interest.
\n
\nAnother problem lies in the long- term popularity of Twitter. While Twitter users in the United States are expected to exceed 12 million this year, Nielsen Online reports that usage might be as fleeting as its 140 character messages. According to Nielsen, 60 percent of U.S. users sign up for Twitter but then do not return to the social network the following month. This equates to a retention rate of only 40 percent.
\n
\nAs mentioned previously, Twitter is taking steps to verify the reliability of its users and, thus, substantiate the accuracy of user postings. If this hurdle can be cleared, it can open the door for Twitter to become a reliable search engine alternative with even greater popularity. Some critics, though, feel the true future of search will not be Google or Twitter but somewhere between the two, provided by a search engine that combines traditional local search with the social media stream of real- time discussions.
\n
<\/p>\n
\nAn even more convenient form of localized search has begun to grow in popularity and is expected to have a real impact in the near future. More users are turning to their mobile devices for online searches, especially for local ones.
\n
\nThe ability to use a mobile phone to search the Internet has freed users from having to search for information about local businesses and services from their homes, while better devices have allowed a more seamless online experience on the road. As a result, more users are relying on mobile search to find local information. In fact, projections estimate that by 2013, almost 30 percent of mobile users around the globe will be using local mobile search services.
\n
\nMobile search is, at its core, very much local search. Businesses large and small can capitalize on it as a means to connect with consumers, and local search in particular will benefit a great deal from the qualities inherent to mobile devices. According to a study performed by the Kelsey Group, local search volume will rise from 28 percent to 35 percent of all mobile searches by 2013.
\n
\nThe trend toward mobile search is not without statistical precedent. Reporting by comScore at the end of 2008 found that there were 228 million mobile phone users. The number of phone users with Internet access rose by 47.4 percent from 2007 to 2008. The rising popularity of Smartphones like the iPhone has added to this, with the total number of U.S. mobile phone users with mobile browsers rising 43 percent from 30.7 million in June 2007 to 44 million in June 2008.
\n
\nIn addition, a 2008 study by the PEW Research Center found that 62 percent of Americans are members of a wireless mobile group and participate in digital activities away from their homes and work. M:Metrics also reported in 2008 that nearly 95 percent of iPhone users access the mobile web for news and information, and 60 percent use the mobile web for mobile search.
\n
\nThis growing number of mobile searches is expected to impact advertising spending down the road. The Kelsey Group released a study that projects mobile web and targeted advertising to rise from $20 million in 2008 to $1.3 billion by 2013. This represents a 130 percent annual growth for local search spending.
\n
\nWhile mobile search advertising is still considered experimental by some marketers, the expected growth of mobile search volume will attract more attention in the near future. And with this growth, mobile search will have to address the weaknesses it faces with regard to search relevance. In fact, the major search providers are making efforts to deliver a more contextually shaped, mobile search user experience. For example, Yahoo!\u2019s oneSearch service considers the location of the user\u2019s phone as well as the context of the search request. The information it then provides is prioritized with contextual relevance to help meet the demands of the user.
\n
\nGet ready for a wild ride in search circles for the next year.
\n
\nSo What does The Future Look Like? Some Predictions:
\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
There\u2019s been a lot of buzz recently about a little thing called Bing! While not having the immediate lift that Microsoft was hoping for\u2026<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":40,"featured_media":1931,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[59,46],"issue":[8],"collection":[],"class_list":["post-1928","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-search","tag-social","issue-whats-happening-in-search"],"acf":[],"gutentor_comment":0,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1928","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/40"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1928"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1928\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1931"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1928"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1928"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1928"},{"taxonomy":"issue","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/issue?post=1928"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/leapgroupnetwork.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=1928"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}